← All projects

UX Research Case Study

Adults
with ADHD

How does the design of online learning platforms shape the experience of adult learners with attention‑deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

Role
UX Researcher
Team
Solo
Duration
6 Months

Goals

  • Fill the UX research gap on adults with ADHD and online learning
  • Investigate experiences engaging with online learning platforms
  • Translate into inclusive design considerations for online learning platforms

Background

Prevalence

Estimated ADHD diagnoses in USA (2023)

  • 7‑18% all children
  • 4‑4.5% all adults

However,

  • ADHD is a lifespan neurological disorder
  • Not simply outgrown with age
  • 60‑80% of ADHD symptoms continue into adulthood

ADHD Symptoms

  • Inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity

In adults, this looks like:

  • Disorganization and problems prioritizing
  • Poor time management skills
  • Problems focusing on a task
  • Trouble multitasking
  • Excessive activity or restlessness
  • Poor planning
  • Low frustration tolerance
  • Frequent mood swings/hot temper
  • Problems following through/completing tasks
  • Trouble coping with stress

Online Learning

  • Growing in popularity since 2010, but especially due to the COVID‑19 pandemic
  • Over 10 million online college students (NCES 2022)
  • 90% of companies offer employee's online learning/training (LinkedIn 2018)
  • 22 million American Coursera users (2023)

Methodology

The project moved through four stages, each one feeding the next.

  1. Literature Review
  2. User Interviews
  3. Affinity Mapping
  4. Design Considerations

Step 01

Literature Review

To start my research, I looked to existing publications that might offer insight into my research question. Below is a recap of some of the most relevant work to my project, however, I failed to find a resource that studied the same intersectionality of adult ADHD and online learning.

Relevant publications reviewed, with the strengths and gaps of each
Title / Author(s) / Year Pros Cons
Online Higher Education for Nontraditional Adult Students: Best Cases of Public Universities (Kim et al 2018)
  • Provides insights into effective online learning experiences for older adults
  • Does not include student perspectives
  • Does not address ADHD
  • Does not explore the actual online learning system design
Learning to Teach Students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Training Experiences for Teachers (Cretu 2018)
  • Defined best practices for teaching students with ADHD
  • Focuses on primary/secondary school ages
  • Insights spoke more to ADHD perceptions than to success metrics of the module
Investigating Current State-of-The-Art Applications of Supportive Technologies for Individuals with ADHD (Husain 2020)
  • Identified publications on recent ADHD supportive technologies
  • 0 papers focused directly on online learning platforms

Step 02

User Interviews

Semi-Structured Interview Protocol

Call opening

  1. Greet and thank participant for joining
  2. Request permission to record
  3. Review purpose of research
  4. Provide housekeeping reminders (informed consent/research participant rights)
  5. Ask participant if they have any questions and answer accordingly

Interview questions

  1. I'd like you to begin by telling me a little about yourself as a student and how you used online learning platforms?
  2. Could you describe your current relationship with education?
  3. Can you talk about the online learning platform you are currently/recently using and your experience with that?
    1. How does that compare to a course you had that did not use a learning platform or that was different in some meaningful way?
  4. Which features of [the online learning platform] have had a positive impact on your learning?
  5. Conversely, which features of [the online learning platform] had a negative impact on your learning?
  6. What could or should online learning platforms do differently in the future to make online learning work better for adults with ADHD?
  7. What haven't I asked you today that you think would be valuable for me to know?

Recruitment

  • Requirements:
    • 18 years or older
    • Has ADHD/ADD
    • Uses/used an online learning platform
    • Resides in the USA
  • Recruited via personal Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit accounts.
  • Participants filled out a Research Participant Interest Form virtually, confirming they:
    • Meet the above requirements
    • Reviewed the informed consent and wish to continue
    • Have availability to meet during timeframe interviews were being conducted
  • 7 total interviews were scheduled and conducted on a rolling basis

Participant Overview

Overview of the seven participants by program type, class modality, delivery and platforms used
# Program Type with Online Learning Class Modality Synchronous / Asynchronous Online Platform(s) Used
3 Graduate Degree In Person Synchronous BlackBoard
5 Professional Certification Virtual Asynchronous Kaplan Financial Education
6 Undergraduate & Graduate Degrees In Person Synchronous
  • BlackBoard
  • Coursera
  • Workday
7 Undergraduate Degree Hybrid Both BlackBoard
8 Graduate Degree In Person Synchronous
  • Canvas
  • Studicata
  • Barbi
  • Quimbee
  • Lex Plug
9 Undergraduate & Graduate Degrees
  • Hybrid
  • Virtual
All synchronous except for 1 course
  • BlackBoard
  • Bright Space
10 Undergraduate & Graduate Degrees Hybrid (both) Synchronous
  • BlackBoard
  • Canvas

Step 03

Affinity Mapping

Transcripts were reduced to notes, then clustered bottom‑up across five passes until stable themes emerged.

  1. 1

    Transcribe

    Every session transcribed in full and stripped of identifying detail.

  2. 2

    Extract

    Individual observations pulled onto discrete notes, one idea per note.

  3. 3

    Cluster

    Notes grouped by similarity without predetermined categories.

  4. 4

    Label

    Each cluster named, split or merged as the grouping settled.

  5. 5

    Synthesise

    Themes translated into the design considerations below.

affinity‑map.png — swap in your own asset

Step 04

Design Considerations

Eight considerations for teams building and or researching learning products, based on participant insight.

Discussion

The considerations above describe directions, not specifications. Each one needs testing against a real product and a real cohort before it can be treated as a rule.

Limitations

  • A small, self‑selected sample recruited from a narrow set of channels.
  • Self‑reported diagnosis and self‑reported experience, without clinical verification.
  • Findings are qualitative and not intended to generalise statistically.
  • No longitudinal follow‑up on whether reported strategies held over time.

References

  1. Author, A. (Year). Title of the cited work. Journal Name, vol(issue), pages. https://doi.org/…
  2. Author, B., & Author, C. (Year). Title of the cited work. Publisher. https://doi.org/…
  3. Author, D. (Year). Title of the cited work. Conference Proceedings, pages. https://doi.org/…
  4. Author, E. (Year). Title of the cited work. Journal Name, vol(issue), pages. https://doi.org/…